Ethical Navigation of Power Dynamics- Considerations for Conceptualizing DEISJ in Assessment (2 CEs)

Abstract

Discussions about issues of race, diversity, equity, inclusion, and social justice are often seen as controversial rather than necessary. Negotiating these discussions may feel daunting and precarious due to limited knowledge of key terminology, regional differences in how these issues are discussed/addressed, and/or personal discomfort with one's personal role in these systemic issues. This non-exhaustive list includes just some of the critical challenges professionals grapple with when incorporating DEISJ issues into their work. Assessment psychologists play many roles, and gaining the skills to successfully manage these challenging discussions is necessary for ethical research, practice, and training. Appreciation of the salience of power dynamics underlying these conversations serves as a common thread in conceptualizing and addressing issues of DEISJ across all roles and contexts. 

The SPA Graduate Student Board of Directors and the EISJ Committee are proudly co-sponsoring this session about the role of power dynamics in how we address and conceptualize issues of race and EISJ in personality assessment research, practice, education, and supervision. These conversations often lack the perspective of the individuals on the disadvantaged side of a power dynamic. This session will highlight students' experiences with difficult conversations facilitated by professors, supervisors, and other professionals. The presenters will provide a framework for better handling these conversations informed by the viewpoint of the people most impacted. 

Presenter

Ksera Dyette | Cup of Tea Counselling and William James College

Sarah Gottlieb | William James College 

Goals & Objectives

1. Identify the role of power dynamics and privilege in successfully navigating discussions regarding issues of DEISJ among professionals in the field of personality assessment.
2. Clarify the ethical imperatives and considerations regarding the role of power dynamics and privilege in addressing and conceptualizing issues of DEISJ in personality assessment.
3. Introduce features of multiple models of practice for the facilitation and management of difficult discussions that are relevant to research, practice, and training in personality assessment.
4. Identify opportunities for incorporating issues of DEISJ into various aspects of personality assessment research, practice, and training.